Chapter 9 of Evolution, the Big Bang, and Other Fables, by A N Mack MD
Consider the following three assumptions.
1. We know that the formation of the universe from nothing was impossible. Quantim fluctuations? Not even close to an explanation. Even Marcelo Gleiser, writing for the notoriously liberal NPR admits this;
It is obvious that this quantum nothingness is very different from an absolute nothingness. Physicists may shrug this away stating that concepts like absolute nothingness are not scientific and hence have no explanatory value. It is indeed true that there is no such thing as absolute nothingness in science, since the vacuum is pregnant with all sorts of stuff. Any scientific explanation presupposes a whole conceptual structure that is absolutely essential for science to function: energy, space, time, the equations we use, the laws of Nature. Science can’t exist without this scaffolding. So, a scientific explanation of the origin of the universe needs to use such concepts to make sense. It necessarily starts from something, which is the best that science can ever hope to do. (1) (For more on this topic see Chapter 17, Nothing Can’t do Something.)
2. We also know that spontaneous generation of life was and is impossible, and no scientist anywhere has been able to accomplish the task. As Michael Denton wrote; “Between a living cell and the most highly ordered non-biological system, such as a crystal or a snowflake, there is a chasm as vast and absolute as it is possible to conceive.”(2)
3. We have established that evolution itself is impossible, as written by Hoyle; “The likelihood of the formation of life from inanimate matter is one to a number with 40,000 noughts after it …. It is big enough to bury Darwin and the whole theory of Evolution.” (3)
But what if all three of these assumptions were wrong? What if magically everything appeared out of nothing, for no reason, and formed itself into life against astronomical, impossible odds, and evolved into multiple magnificent and self replicating organisms. What then?
Even then evolution is impossible!
Why? Because living organisms are made up of proteins, and proteins have specific, utilitarian, designed, functional shapes. Proteins are fascinating, complicated, three- dimensional molecules that function as a result of their shape. The basic shape of the proteins such as enzymes allows them to present a particular molecule, or reactive agent, at a particular three dimensional site, exposed in such a way that it interacts, usually somewhat like a lock and key, with another protein or membrane in the cell so that a chemical process is either turned on or off (in the case of enzymes), or a portion of the cell is built.
Douglas Axe showed evolution to be impossible when “He provided empirical backing for this conclusion from experimental research he earlier published in the Journal of Molecular Biology, finding that only one in 1074 amino-acid sequences yields functional protein folds.“(4) Now never mind that that number, 10 with 74 zero’s after it, is impossible even once. That chance, random impossibility actually has to repeat itself EVERY SINGLE TIME any protein or enzyme hopes to evolve into to a new useful type of protein. So add another thousand zeros! Add another billion, trillion nails to the coffin of evolution!
If one alters the DNA by some mechanism (radiation for instance) and the DNA now produces a slightly different protein, then the 3D structure of the protein is altered, and it does not become a new functional protein with a different and “better” use in the cell or the organism. It becomes a useless, broken, messy, senseless system, producing meaningless and almost always damaging or fatal proteins. (i.e. Lou Gehrigs, Alzheimers, Cystic Fibrosis). For example, according to Cystic Fibrosis News today, “The development of CF results from a misfolded or improperly functioning protein known as the cystic fibrosis conductance regulator (CFTR).”(5)
There are, on the other hand, NO (none, nada, zero) examples of enzymes or proteins which have been altered as a result of genetic damage to form a new, improved, or more functional state. The oft cited example of bacterial resistance to antibiotics is NOT such an example. According to Munita and Arias in Mechanisms of Antibiotic Resistance, “Classically, bacteria acquire external genetic material through three main strategies, i) transformation (incorporation of naked DNA), ii) transduction (phage mediated) and, iii) conjugation (bacterial “sex”).” (6) In each case the genetic material ALREADY EXISTED and no new protein or altered gene was required. In fact, the path to antibiotic resistance typically involves a loss of genetic material from damaged DNA. The bacterium is no longer as healthy and effective and rapidly growing as it was before, but it has a side benefit of being resistant to a particular antibiotic.
“If God were small enough to be understood, He would not be big enough to be worshiped.”(7) Evelyn Underhill.
Secular scientists and institutions teach that the creation of life on earth was a random, accidental event. Though such a thing defies all logic and probability, it is nevertheless taught as a supposed “scientific fact”. In 1993, Michael Behe introduced the concept of irreducible complexity (IC), as a solid proof against evolution. (8) In a variety of manners secular writers have argued against (but never disproven) his initial arguments. IC is unpopular, but its basic premise is logical, sound, and supportable. It is in fact infinitely more probable and likely to be true than ANY version of evolution. And Behe’s resarch is now being validated. Michael Eggnor stated that Behe’s research has contributed to recent Nobel prizes in Biochemistry, and he noted conversely that“No Nobel Prize has ever been awarded for Darwinian research, and there’s a reason for that. Darwinism denies purpose in biology, and denial of biological purpose is a catastrophic impediment to science.”(9)
As science advances, we have found more, not less, evidences of the absolutely enormous complexity of living things. However the answer by secular scientists is always the same, something along the lines of… “Evolution must have happened, we just don’t understand it yet”. And there is a certain simplicity and elegance to this argument. It assumes a positive and growing body of human knowledge, and it assumes the eventual ability of mankind to overcome all obstacles to knowledge… even the knowledge of our very origins. This, from a humanistic and scientific position, is very appealing. But as we can discuss later, it is also dangerous in its potential for unreasonable pride and arrogance about our limited human abilities. But the question is not whether it is appealing. Is it true?
There are thousands of incomprehensibly complex systems at the cellular level. Complexity is a hallmark of the microscopic biological world. Molecular biologist Michael Denton wrote, “Although the tiniest bacterial cells are incredibly small, weighing less than 10-12 grams, each is in effect a veritable micro-miniaturized factory containing thousands of exquisitely designed pieces of intricate molecular machinery, made up altogether of one hundred thousand million atoms, far more complicated than any machinery built by man and absolutely without parallel in the non-living world.” 
Perhaps since the secular academic community has learned to pat itself on the back for mounting a few (albeit weak and insufficient) arguments to Behe’s theory of Irreducible Complexity, we should introduce another concept. I will call it Absolutely Incomprehensible Complexity.
You see, the entire idea that humanity can comprehend life or the cosmos is absurd. It is as ridiculous as a machine talking back to it’s maker. The layers upon layers of complexity represented at every level by DNA, RNA, proteins, fats, glycogen, mitochondria, cell membranes, plasma, electrolytes, semipermeable membranes, and all the necessary substrates for life and growth are quite literally incomprehensible. Every time biologists find an explanation for one thing, another layer of complexity is found. Science has not brought us closer to understanding the mystery of life. Science just makes us much more aware of the mysteriousness of life!
When microbiologists and biochemists began to sequence proteins, they found that the protein’s function was more from its shape than from its chemical content. As stated above, this discovery tells us that minor modifications (evolutionary steps) are virtually impossible in proteins. (Because one could alter a protein’s shape tens of thousands of ways that make it dysfunctional or even lethal, before finding a single alteration that might have a “new and improved” function.)
Recently it has been discovered that the genetic code of DNA is almost a Rubik’s cube of complexity. It is so complex that one area of DNA can code for more than one protein, or have multiple expressions. (11) One cannot randomly alter one, or a few atoms via mutation, without having adverse effects on multiple biologic systems. If a frog wanted to evolve into a lizard, each step forward could quite literally cause two or three steps backward! Evolution, as always, cannot withstand the facts. Life is not just Irreducibly Complex, it is Absolutely Incomprehensibly Complex.
And this is exactly what we would expect from an infinite, omniscient, and omnipotent Creator God. As the Bible states in John 1: 3 “Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.”
(2) Denton, Michael Evolution: A Theory in Crisis Bethesda, MD: Adler and Adler Publishers, Inc., 1986 pp. 249-250
(3) Fred Hoyle (1981) “Hoyle on Evolution” Nature, Vol. 294, No. 5837, Nov. 12, p. 148
(5) Stephen Shannon, Cystic Fibrosis News Today, March 12, 2015.
(6) Munita, J and Arias C., /www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4888801/
(10)Michael Denton, “Evolution: A Theory in Crisis,” 1986, p. 250.
Isaiah 45:18 For thus saith the Lord that created the heavens; God himself that formed the earth and made it; he hath established it, he created it not in vain, he formed it to be inhabited: I am the Lord; and there is none else.