I’ll bet you were taught that Natural selection proves Evolution. For nearly a century evolutionists have conflated natural selection with evolution. But read just a bit further and you will find it is nothing more than a sleight of hand card trick. Natural Selection (NS) is real. NS exists. But NS is NOT evolution, is not responsible for evolution, and in no way supports or proves evolution. No matter how much conjecture and theorizing sites like livescience.com subject us to, there exists absolutely NO proof of evolution.(1)
In reality, NS has nothing to do with Evolution. How do I know this? Natural selection is conservative of genetic material, whereas evolution requires the creation of vast amounts of new genetic material. NS creates nothing. Evolution (if were a reality) would have created the genetic material for every living thing on earth.
In other words, natural selection can only increase or decrease the number of certain cats, dogs, moths, or bacteria in a larger population. It cannot alter, evolve, or morph them into new or different creatures. Scientifically studying natural selection does not lead to a conclusion of Darwinism or evolution being true. It is merely an observation which is equally as supportive of a created world or an evolved world.
The online dictionary defines natural selection as follows: “the process whereby organisms better adapted to their environment tend to survive and produce more offspring. The theory of its action was first fully expounded by Charles Darwin and is now believed to be the main process that brings about evolution.” Note the insertion, without any proof or logic, of the concept of evolution, and note the assertion “now believed”. Even pro-evolutionary writers admit there is absolutely no proof they are connected. Yet atheists and educators everywhere have for decades performed this sleight of hand, explaining one logical concept (NS) and then substituting another completely illogical and unsubstantiated theory (evolution).
For decades, evolutionists and liberal educators used the peppered moth as “proof” of evolution. Sewall Wright called it “the clearest case in which a conspicuous evolutionary process has actually been observed.”(2) But while the peppered moth does provide evidence of natural selection, it in no way supports evolution. In fact, one wonders, if this is, in the words of Sewall Wright the “clearest case of a conspicious evolutionary process”, why he supported evolutionary theory at all! If a change in the proportions of two different phenotypes of the same moth is considered the best evidence zoologists have for evolution, it is indeed a theory without scientific support!
Creation and Evolution advocates can agree, the light colored phenotype (of the moth) may confer a survival advantage where light colors blend in, and the dark phenotype may be beneficial in a darker or more polluted environment. However, that is where the agreement (and the science) ends and the conjecture begins. The dark and light alleles may just as easily have been created or evolved, and neither side can scientifically prove that their side must be correct. But every scientist should readily agree that when either phenotype becomes more prominent, NO NEW GENETIC MATERIAL is produced or created.
It should be noted that whatever you believe about evolution and the tree moth, the dark and light alleles have never changed or evolved. No new moth has been created. Both colors have been present through all of the recorded history of the tree moth. Thus Natural Selection is NOT Evolution. Evolution requires a gradual change in the genetic material over time. Natural selection is simply a mechanism by which members of a population best suited to the environment may survive and pass on their genetic material. These are vastly different concepts.
Or as written by Biochemist John Marcus, (Dr. Marcus is research officer at the Cooperative Research Centre for Tropical Plant Pathology, University of Queensland, Australia.) “The key fact to note here is that natural selection simply cannot act unless there are functional, self-replicating molecules present to act on.”(3)
Eve pro-evolution institutions like Berkeley admit that Natural Selection can NOT explain the origin of life, NS does NOT occur by chance, and evolution often occurs RAPIDLY.(4) All of these ideas would have been considered complete nonsense to Darwin. Yet these institutions persist in pushing the idea of evolution, because they cannot accept the alternative of a Creator, God, with all the implications of Divine Creation.
NS does not create life, or create molecules, or create DNA. NS simply allows one already created creature to thrive over another created creature. There is much more we will discuss about NS. But for know just know this. NS is real. Evolution is not.
Isaiah 45:7 states, “The One forming light and creating darkness, Causing well-being and creating calamity; I am the LORD who does all these.”
(2) Rice, Stanley A. (2007). Encyclopedia of Evolution. New York: Facts On File. p. 308.
(3) In Six Days, p. 172.